Hath Taslima Eyes?
There’s a limit to waiting. I have been waiting for the last two weeks to let the news come to an end instead of stirring a few more feminist minds by giving enough material to liberals to argue in favor of the persecuted, and most of all to see how BJP would react to our ever controversial Taslima N. But thanks to the ever efficient media no news is ever left alone to wither away or dry up in the regional spotlight. Every item is worth a glance, every female’s worth an attention, every controversy is worth the silver time. One who had fled to Sweden in Jan 24, 1994 has made a comeback and this time, to the headlines of every newspaper in India . Editorials on her have peaked. While I am an avid critic of undeserving attention, I too, ironically am writing about her. Indian government has turned her into a glorious hero.
The mythic masks that are set for a woman often push her to become one. Therefore, did Taslima N took the Woolfian advice and decided to become a writer after she had killed the angels in the house? Perhaps Spenser’s Errour from The Faerie Queene being a “half woman, half serpent” added inspiration to the artist. Perhaps, the other monstrous Duessa, who assumed the image of Una and tempted men, tempted the unconventional artist. Perhaps Lucifera’s House of Pride is what TN was looking for as an ideal home to settle in.Perhaps the twin images of angel and monster is what a creator looks for…just because it gives the mind an escape route ether way. Otherwise, why on earth would Taslima look for quick fame after she had successfully written: Nirbachito Column (Selected Columns)? Why would she look for ignominy and dishonor through Lajja(Shame), Amar Meye Bela (My Girlhood) et al? Why would her literature be branded as pornography and be banned in her own homeland? And if that ban had stopped a reader from downloading it through net, then that would be another issue. But Lajja in Bengali can be downloaded in seconds. I did too. Taslima may have passionate dwellings within her own self, but she could try holding her tongue back instead of holding forth. If it’s masculine politics she wants to destroy, she should not concentrate on her cosmic libido. And on the other hand, if her literature is supposed to be political, then why would she still need another land? Why should her new book be : Narir Kono Desh Nei (A Woman has no Country)? Does a Nari need a country? If she had ever been a Woolf lover, she too would need no country, “have no country” and “want no country”. (Three Guineas ).
India ’s controversial poet Kamala Das has had no place for quite a while. She pictures herself as the goddess Durga and she titles one of her chapters “I Was Carlo’s Sita,” in which she tells about one of her affairs. Das has been quite vocal about passion and has not shied away from the angle of aesthetic exposure:
Getting a man to love you is easy
Only be honest about your wants as
Woman. Stand nude before the glass with him
So that he sees himself the stronger one
And believes it so, and you so much more
Softer, younger, lovelier.
Women like Das in this manner have been changing the Southasian scenario of fiction and poetry as more and more of subjective expressions have crept into the art. But is the private considered and acknowledged as art? Should there be a negation of ego where creativity comes in? Should creativity be free of debts to even the self? As much as a woman is like the door hinges rusting with time and sandwiched between the private and the public, she also needs to attempt liberation of her identity in spite of suffering and the search for her identity should soar beyond all conceivable heights.
Taslima for example, needed no stamp of a prescribed feminist. Was it so difficult for her to have broken away from the simultaneity of oppressions? Taslima should have realized that not all of us would feel the same as her. I have been rejoicing doubly ever since she has, as a token of regret, agreed to destroy pages from her book: Dikhondito (Halved). Yet, as much as I feel the need to slam the door on her sensitivities, her face riddled with fear on TV evokes a strange sympathy even in her arch enemies. As much as I want to confront her blasphemous thread, the fundamentalists make it impossible to do so.
Come what may, I shall never side with you, Razakars. If India wants to bear your burden for the sake of appearing apparently secular, let her do so. Why should Bangladesh allow you to become an issue? BJP and Narendra Modi need you. I don’t. Therefore, the united Muslims of West Bengal, neither do you stand a chance, nor does Taslima’s compulsions and preferences of spotlight.
We women may feel trapped against a glassy pane, we women may take off and fall prey to the politics of orgasm, but we have enough strength in us to map our spirits and check out for ourselves whether we have defied the category of pregnability and motherhood or whether we are simply born to embrace masquerades of performativity.